Machinery & Production

Machinery and equipment are not only at the heart of K, but also form a key part of K-Mag. Our articles offer fascinating insights into innovative production processes and the workings of pioneering machines that are taking efficiency and quality in the industry to new heights.

Nahaufnahme eines runden Metallgehäuses mit kupferfarbener, gezackter Innenstruktur vor unscharfem Zickzack-Hintergrund.

Results (51)

  • #Coatings #E-mobility #Electronics #Polymers #Processing #Economy

    South Korea: Why electric car batteries need plastic

    At the charging point, it’s all about how quickly you can get back on the road. When you’re on the move, it’s all about range. Both depend on the plastics inside the battery. South Korean battery manufacturer Samsung SDI, part of the Samsung Group, demonstrates just how important these materials are.

    Learn more
  • #Machinery & Equipment #Developments #Economy

    Hydrogen seals: Why elastomers are becoming a safety factor

    Hydrogen is the smallest molecule and easily penetrates rubber and plastics. Permeation, swelling and explosive decompression can cause seals to fail. In the German-Japanese SusSeal4H2 project, BAM, Freudenberg, NOK and Kyushu University have investigated how seals can be made safer and more sustainable, including PTFE-free alternatives.

    Learn more
  • #Sustainability #Machinery & Equipment #Economy

    Wear-resistant without PTFE: How the materials industry is responding to PFAS regulation

    PTFE is considered a classic material for low-friction sliding parts – yet, as a PFAS, the plastic is at the centre of the planned EU restrictions. The materials industry is responding: new PTFE-free 3D printing resins and compounds for injection moulding promise low wear without any fluoropolymers at all. What the alternatives can achieve, which applications they are suitable for, and what users should bear in mind.

    Learn more
  • Industrial 3D Printing: From Adaptive Manufacturing to Series Production and Digital Spare Parts

    3 current examples from EOS, 1zu1scale, LEHVOSS and MORSAN Additive manufacturing is increasingly being used in automated production processes, series production and digital spare parts production. Copyright: EOS, Darko Todorovic, MORSAN 08.06.2026 From prototyping tool to production technology – rising demands for flexible supply chains, shorter development cycles and customised products are driving the use of additive manufacturing in the plastics industry. Three current examples show how companies are using 3D printing for adaptive production lines, scalable series production and digital spare parts concepts. Together, they illustrate how additive manufacturing is increasingly becoming part of modern production strategies. Adaptive Manufacturing with Industrial 3D Printing Industrial 3D printing enables functionally integrated and weight-optimised robotic grippers for automated manufacturing. Copyright: EOS EOS is collaborating with Siemens on concepts for adaptive manufacturing processes that enable production lines to adapt more quickly to varying requirements. The focus is on automated and AI-supported processes for industrial additive manufacturing. One example is the production of customised sports shoe midsoles that can be flexibly adapted to different usage profiles. The combination of industrial 3D printing, automation and data-driven process control is intended to shorten development and manufacturing cycles and increase process reliability. Furthermore, EOS uses additive manufacturing for production tools such as robotic grippers or vibratory spiral conveyors. This enables: Reduced material usage Lead times be shortened Components be functionally integrated and weight-optimised Industrial additive manufacturing is also gaining importance in safety-critical applications. These include, for example, complex plastic components for high-speed drones, which rely on flexible production and supply chains. Source: EOS Expansion of Additive Series Production 1zu1scale is expanding its capacity for the additive series production of small plastic components. Copyright: Darko Todorovic 1zu1scale is investing in new equipment for industrial additive manufacturing whilst simultaneously expanding its toolmaking facilities for injection moulding. The aim is to make the series production of small plastic components more efficient. Among the new additions is a system for the direct production of black plastic parts to series production quality. This eliminates the need for an additional colouring step during post-processing. The technology is particularly suited to applications in: Electronics Mechanical engineering Automation Robotics In addition, the company is expanding its toolmaking capabilities to include the production of precision steel tools for higher volumes in injection moulding. Source: 1zu1scale Digital Spare Parts Manufacturing for the Food Industry Digital spare parts concepts and industrial 3D printing processes support flexible production and maintenance strategies. Copyright: MORSAN The LEHVOSS Group and MORSAN are leveraging digital spare parts warehouses and industrial 3D printing technologies for the food and beverage industry. Instead of keeping physical spare parts in stock, components are stored digitally and manufactured using additive manufacturing when required. High-performance materials for industrial FFF/FDM processes are used. The additively manufactured components must withstand high mechanical stresses as well as intensive cleaning processes. The portfolio includes, amongst other things: Conveyor belt sprockets Grippers and guide elements Sliders and ejectors According to the company, a key advantage lies in the design freedom offered by additive manufacturing: components can be specifically adapted to real-world stresses and functionally optimised. Source: LEHVOSS Context: Additive Manufacturing Becomes Part of Industrial Production Strategies These examples demonstrate just how diverse industrial 3D printing applications have become – ranging from automated production lines and scalable series production to digital spare parts concepts. Additive manufacturing is thus increasingly becoming an integral part of modern production and supply chain strategies and remains a key area of innovation for the plastics and rubber industry. The portrait was generated by AI. Author: Elena Blume | K-Mag Elena Blume has been writing for various industry magazines for eight years and joined the K-Mag editorial team in 2021. She is particularly interested in topics related to innovative plastics solutions that contribute to sustainability and address current challenges relevant to industry and society. Key Takeaway: Additive manufacturing is increasingly establishing itself as an industrial production technology – particularly where flexible processes, customised components and digital supply chains are required. More around Machinery & Production

    Learn more
  • High-Energy Electron-Beam Technology for Advanced Polymer Engineering

    03.06.2026 Electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation is a well-established technology in materials science with broad industrial applications. In the polymer industry, it is mainly known for surface modification, such as curing coatings, thin layers, and highly pigmented inks as an alternative to UV curing. It is also used in niche polymer-processing applications, for example the pre-crosslinking of rubber compounds in tire manufacturing, where surface irradiation creates a hardened skin that improves shape stability during vulcanization. Unlocking Bulk Material Modification, Scalable Processing, and Next-Generation Polymer Architectures Far less common—but increasingly important—is the use of E-beam irradiation for bulk material processing, where electrons trigger chemical reactions deep inside polymeric materials. Recent advances in accelerator technology, particularly the transition from kilovolt to megavolt acceleration voltages, have dramatically expanded the application range. Modern high-energy accelerators now operate in the MeV range, increasing penetration depths from sub-millimeter levels to several centimeters and, under optimized conditions, up to one decimeter. How Deep Does E-Beam Radiation Penetrate into Materials? Modern high-energy electron accelerators achieve penetration depths of several centimeters, enabling the uniform modification of entire polymer components rather than just their surfaces. At the same time, high beam power and excellent dose homogeneity ensure efficient and reproducible processing of large material volumes. Penetration depth increases with electron-beam energy, enabling the uniform treatment of thicker polymer materials; Copyright: IBA For a 10 MeV accelerator, penetration depth in a material with a density of 1 g/cm³ is approximately 5 cm. This depth scales inversely with density and is largely independent of color or chemical composition. As a result, E-beam irradiation is highly suitable for heavily pigmented systems and complex composites containing fibers, fillers, and additives. High-energy systems also provide significantly improved dose homogeneity. With double-sided irradiation, dose variations below 20% can be achieved across material thicknesses up to one decimeter, enabling consistent bulk modification. From Laboratory Tool to Industrial-Scale Polymer Processing While acceleration voltage determines maximum penetration depth, beam power defines industrial productivity. Over recent decades, accelerator power has increased from 20–50 kW to beyond 500 kW, enabling processing capacities of roughly 20–70 tons per hour. This combination of high penetration depth and throughput fundamentally changes the industrial potential of E-beam technology, making many previously uneconomical applications viable at scale. Beyond established uses such as crosslinking cables, tubes, and composites, a rapidly emerging field is E-beam-assisted synthesis of engineered polymers with tailored functionalities and advanced architectures. Modern E-beam accelerators can effectively function as highly efficient continuous chemical reactors capable of processing powders, pellets, molten streams, liquids, extruded profiles, and fully shaped components. Key Performance Indicators of Modern E-Beam Systems Parameter Typical Value Acceleration Voltage up to 10 MeV Penetration Depth up to approx. 5 cm Double-Sided Irradiation up to approx. 10 cm material thickness Accelerator Power >500 kW Throughput 20–70 t/h Typical Applications Crosslinking, Grafting, Branching, Recycling How E-Beam Radiation Modifies Polymer Structures Depending on the dose, E-beam irradiation can induce crosslinking, grafting, long-chain branching, or chain scission in polymers; Copyright: IBA E-beam processing enables enhanced material performance, including improved composite strength, grafting for better adhesion, long-chain branching for lightweight foams, and the upgrading of recycled plastics. Depending on polymer type, formulation, dose, temperature, and processing conditions, E-beam irradiation can induce curing, long-chain branching, chain extension, grafting, or controlled chain scission. Unlike conventional bulk polymer modification methods, E-beam processing does not require thermal radical initiators such as peroxides. This residue-free approach can be particularly attractive for sensitive applications, including food-contact materials. How are reactive radicals generated? When polymers are exposed to high-energy electrons, reactive radicals are generated primarily through homolytic bond scission. Bonds with lower dissociation energies are preferentially cleaved, creating reactive species that initiate a wide range of chemical transformations. At very high doses, polymers and other organic compounds can undergo pyrolysis or complete mineralization. This capability is currently being explored for the degradation of persistent pollutants such as PFAS in contaminated water, sludge, and soil. Why Use E-Beam Instead of Conventional Chemical Approaches? An IBA Rhodotron being assembled; Copyright: IBA A major advantage of E-beam technology is the decoupling of radical formation from temperature . Unlike peroxide-based systems, radicals can be generated at virtually any desired temperature, expanding the process window and minimizing undesired side reactions such as thermo-oxidation and uncontrolled chain scission. Conventional thermal processes often suffer from non-uniform radical generation due to temperature gradients and uneven initiator distribution. In reactive extrusion, local concentration spikes exceeding 1000% of the average can occur, leading to variability in material properties and premature gelation. In contrast, E-beam irradiation provides highly uniform radical generation governed directly by dose distribution . Well-designed systems achieve dose variations below 20%, enabling process control unattainable with conventional methods. This control allows polymer architectures that are difficult or impossible to produce chemically . For example, high grafting levels of functional vinylic monomers such as maleic anhydride or silanes onto polyolefins, polyamides, or fluoropolymers can be achieved with fewer side reactions including gelation, thermal degradation, and homopolymerization. Case Study: Long-Chain-Branched Polypropylene A key example is the transformation of linear polypropylene (PP) into long-chain branched polypropylene (LCB-PP). Linear PP has low melt strength, limiting its use in foaming, thermoforming, and film blowing. Introducing long-chain branches increases chain entanglement, improving melt strength and process stability. This branching process requires a delicate balance between chain scission and recombination. Excessive scission lowers melt strength, while excessive recombination causes crosslinking and gelation. The objective is to maintain low melt viscosity for processability while achieving high melt strength to stabilize the molten polymer until solidification. Academic and patent literature show that E-beam-induced reactions provide superior control over polymer architecture compared with reactive extrusion, resulting in improved rheological performance. Is It Cost-Competitive and Scalable? E-beam-assisted polymer modification has been used industrially for more than two decades, initially in specialty polymers. Historically, adoption was limited by low beam power and high capital costs. Recent advances in high-power accelerator technology have changed this significantly. Today, E-beam systems support throughputs of 5–70 tons per hour, with processing costs falling below €100 per ton in some applications. For pilot-scale or low-volume production, irradiation is often outsourced to service providers, typically starting above €1,000 per ton. As production volume increases, costs commonly drop below €200 per ton. In very high-throughput, low-dose applications—such as branching EPDM rubber to improve green strength—costs can even fall below €20 per ton. Despite these advances, E-beam processing is still often viewed as an expensive niche technology, a perception that no longer reflects current industrial reality. What Does the Future Hold? As the gap between polymer chemistry and irradiation technology continues to close, new applications and business opportunities are rapidly emerging. Innovations such as micro-pulse E-beaming and variable-dose scanning are opening new possibilities in process control and material design. Modern E-beam accelerators can increasingly be viewed as highly tunable continuous chemical reactors, capable of controlling where radicals are generated, in what quantity, at what rate, and under which thermal conditions. This level of precision significantly expands the polymer engineering toolbox and positions E-beam technology as a key enabler for next-generation high-performance polymer materials. To accelerate adoption, IBA is developing dedicated E-beam accelerators while actively supporting polymer chemistry R&D through collaborations with industry and a broad network of E-beam service and testing centers across Europe, the United States, and Asia. Guest contribution by Dr Marin Steenackers – Materials Chemist at IBA Industrial Solutions, based on the technical white paper ‘High-Energy Electron-Beam Technology for Advanced Polymer Engineering’ (2026) 3 Key Takeaways E-beam technology enables true bulk material modification. Modern high-energy accelerators achieve penetration depths of several centimeters, allowing entire polymer components to be modified rather than just their surfaces. Polymer properties can be tailored without chemical initiators. By generating reactive radicals directly within the material, E-beam processing enables crosslinking, grafting, branching, and other modifications without leaving additive residues behind. Industrial-scale processing is now economically viable. Advances in accelerator power have significantly increased throughput while reducing processing costs, opening the door to a growing range of large-scale polymer engineering applications. More around Machinery & Production

    Learn more
  • Moretto in Motion 2026: Mobile Showroom for Machinery and Equipment

    Roadshow brings automation, energy efficiency and digital solutions directly to plastics processors across Europe The "Moretto in Motion" roadshow brings machinery and systems to processors across Europe. Copyright: Moretto 15.05.2026 With the "Moretto in Motion 2026" roadshow, Moretto is bringing its technologies directly to customers across Europe. The mobile showroom provides practical insights into automation solutions for plastics processing – from drying and dosing to process monitoring. The aim is to demonstrate specific use cases and address individual requirements on site. The 'Moretto in Motion' truck demonstrates technologies for efficient plastics processing directly on site; Copyright: Moretto. Mobile Platform for Plastics Processing Technologies The roadshow kicks off in Italy and travels through key European markets such as Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Croatia and the United Kingdom. At its heart is a mobile innovation hub: a specially equipped truck that brings machinery, equipment and digital tools directly to processors. On site, visitors can experience the systems under realistic conditions. Interactive displays, QR codes and video applications provide additional information on automation, energy efficiency and the connected value chain . Focus on Efficiency, Precision and Digitalisation The solutions presented cover key process steps in plastics processing. These include: Conveyor technology Drying systems Dosing and mixing technology Granulation Tempering and cooling systems Material storage and monitoring These technologies aim to make processes more stable, transparent and resource-efficient. Particular emphasis is placed on aspects such as Industry 4.0, process monitoring and energy saving . Visitors experience process solutions and digitalisation concepts in practical use. Copyright: Moretto Interactive Insights and Individual Advice A key element of the tour is direct interaction with specialists. Experts from Moretto explain applications, carry out simulations and answer specific questions. This allows requirements to be analysed immediately and potential solutions to be discussed. The combination of technical demonstrations and personal dialogue helps companies to further develop their production processes in a targeted manner – for example, with regard to sustainability, recyclability and increased efficiency. Broad-based Technology Portfolio Moretto offers a wide range of solutions, protected by numerous patents. The systems are designed to reliably process a variety of materials – from conventional polymers to recycled materials – whilst ensuring consistent quality. Exhibitors & products around machinery & equipment Machinery and plant for processing Post processing machines & downstream equipment Machinery & plant for finishing, decorating, printing and marking Welding machines Process automation To all exhibitors in this category Source Moretto At a glance The "Moretto in Motion 2026" roadshow brings plastics processing technologies directly to companies across Europe via a mobile demonstration platform. The focus is on automation solutions for key process steps such as drying, dosing and process monitoring. On site, trade visitors will gain practical insights and have the opportunity for direct discussion on efficient and sustainable production processes. More around Machinery & Production

    Learn more
  • ENGEL Unveils World's Largest Injection Moulding Machine: duo 12000 US for Large-Format Components

    Mit der duo 12000 US präsentiert ENGEL eine besonders leistungsstarke Spritzgießmaschine für großformatige Kunststoffbauteile. Die Technologie ermöglicht integrierte Produktionsprozesse und neue Anwendungen in E-Mobilität, Infrastruktur und Industrie.

    Learn more
  • MIT Develops 3D-printed Floor Trusses from Recycled Plastics

    Large-scale additive manufacturing turns plastic waste into lightweight structural components for future housing The future of housing could increasingly rely on recycled plastics, for example in structural elements produced using additive manufacturing. 27.03.2026 MIT researchers are exploring how recycled plastics can be used in construction by 3D printing structural elements such as floor trusses. The approach combines additive manufacturing with polymer composites to create lightweight, load-bearing components that could help address both plastic waste and the global demand for housing. MIT researchers use large-format 3D printing to produce structural components from recycled plastics and test their load-bearing performance. Copyright: MIT From Plastic Waste to Structural Building Elements Engineers at MIT have developed a 3D-printed floor truss system made from recycled plastic, demonstrating the potential of polymer-based construction materials . The concept aims to give single-use plastics, such as bottles and packaging, a second life as structural components in buildings. Using large-scale additive manufacturing, the team printed trusses that can be assembled into a conventional floor system. The elements are designed to be lighter, modular and easier to transport than traditional wood-based structures. Load-bearing Performance Meets Building Standards The researchers tested the printed system under increasing loads. The result: the structure withstood more than 4,000 pounds , exceeding key requirements set by U.S. building standards. Each truss weighs around 13 pounds and can be produced in approximately 13 minutes , highlighting the efficiency of large-format 3D printing. The design also optimises the stiffness-to-weight ratio , ensuring structural stability with minimal material use. The modular floor system combines 3D-printed trusses, piles and end caps made from recycled plastics to form a lightweight construction framework. Copyright: MIT Additive Manufacturing with Recycled Polymer Composites The trusses were produced using a composite material made from recycled PET and glass fibres , improving both durability and printability. The long-term goal is to process " dirty" plastic waste directly, without extensive cleaning or preprocessing. The MIT HAUS research group is working towards integrating shredding, pelletising and printing into decentralised production systems. These could enable local manufacturing of building components using regionally available plastic waste. Potential for Circular Construction and Housing Solutions Beyond floor trusses, the researchers aim to print additional structural elements such as wall studs, roof trusses and foundations , enabling the construction of entire building frames. The approach could contribute to circular economy models in construction , reducing dependence on timber while addressing plastic waste streams. It may also support scalable solutions for global housing demand, particularly in regions with limited access to traditional building materials. Source Massachusetts Institute of Technology At a glance MIT uses large-scale 3D printing to turn recycled plastics into structural building components. The printed trusses combine low weight with high load-bearing capacity , exceeding building standards. The approach could enable circular construction and decentralised housing production using plastic waste. More around Machinery & Production

    Learn more
  • Injection molding or 3D printing? Why decision-makers today strategically combine both

    The requirements for plastics processing are changing noticeably Exclusively for K-Mag Injection molding and 3D printing not only exist side by side, but are also strategically planned to be used in combination; Copyright: chatgpt-image-4-feb-2026-12-41-21 11.02.2026 Sustainability requirements, increasing cost pressure, volatile markets, and shorter innovation cycles are presenting companies with new challenges. Production decisions are no longer purely technical issues, but are becoming strategic decisions. It is becoming increasingly clear in the industry that the focus is no longer on individual machines, but on how production strategies can be made flexible and future-proof. From clear allocations to strategic portfolios For many years, the roles were clearly defined. Injection molding stood for efficient series production with stable volumes, while additive manufacturing was used for prototypes and special applications. This clear distinction is increasingly blurring. Markets are less predictable and product life cycles are shorter. Today, companies are confronted with very different requirements within a single production portfolio. Production landscapes are becoming more diverse—and more strategic. Combined approaches are coming into focus in order to meet different requirements in parallel. In the past : stable markets, predictable quantities, clear assignment of a technology to an application. Today : volatile demand, shorter product life cycles, and new regulatory requirements call for flexible, combinable production strategies. Product designers examine and discuss 3D-printed prototypes in the design studio. Which strategy suits which requirements? Injection molding in industrial plastics processing remains the backbone of the industry, especially where large quantities, high process stability, and reproducible quality are required. At the same time, there is a growing need for more flexible solutions, for example for smaller batch sizes, in product development, or when demand fluctuates greatly. This is where additive manufacturing comes into play in the plastics industry. It enables rapid adjustments, shortens development times, and allows for economical production runs in areas that are difficult to cover with traditional series processes. The decisive factor here is not either/or, but rather the targeted use of both processes in line with specific requirements. Agreements on how digitization can be used for new production strategies are more important today than ever before. Conflicting goals in production strategy With growing technological diversity, conflicting goals are also increasing. Efficiency is pitted against flexibility, short-term cost targets against long-term investment security. When making investment decisions in particular, companies must weigh up whether to focus on maximum capacity utilization with stable volumes—or consciously factor in flexibility in order to be able to respond to market changes. Digitalization in plastics processing plays a central role in this area of tension—as a connecting element between processes, machines, and data. Statements from the industry make it clear that digitalization is increasingly seen as a prerequisite for strategic production decisions: “Digitalization is another very important topic for all of our customers, and that in a certain way, push on us the responsibility of helping them in this transition,” says Stefano Chiozzini, Closure Business Unit Manager at SACMI. This makes it clear that digitalization is not just a matter of efficiency, but a prerequisite for making different production strategies manageable in the first place. In practice, companies are responding to this with different strategies. Instead of focusing exclusively on maximum capacity utilization, they are investing specifically in flexibility—for example, through modular plant concepts or the addition of additive processes to existing series processes. The decisive factor here is not so much the individual technology as the question of how quickly production capacities can be adjusted, risks distributed, and new applications developed. Exhibitors & products around plastics processing Processing technologies Follow on treatment of plastics products Supplying Product groups Products To all exhibitors in this category New approaches to plastics production can be found by thinking in new combinations. When combinations make sense Combined production strategies are becoming increasingly important, especially where requirements are unclear: with fluctuating quantities, new materials, or increasing regulatory requirements . In such scenarios, supplementing traditional processes with additive manufacturing can reduce risks and expand the scope for action—for example, when transitioning from development to series production or in uncertain market conditions. Nicolai Lammert, General Manager of YIZUMI Germany, also describes this approach as a response to multifactorial challenges. Customers rarely have just one problem, but must deal with different requirements simultaneously. Accordingly, the aim is to combine different technologies in such a way that they together deliver the greatest possible benefit. Copyright: Messe Düsseldorf/ctillmann Strategic importance for the plastics industry What is emerging here is a fundamental change in perspective. Production decisions are increasingly being understood as strategic portfolio decisions. Technological diversity is becoming a management task—not as an end in itself, but as a means of responding flexibly to market changes. K 2025 clearly demonstrated how diverse the paths to this goal are. It shows that sustainable plastics production depends less on individual technologies than on the ability to combine them sensibly and think strategically. From process to strategy The combination of injection molding and 3D printing exemplifies a broader trend in the plastics industry: away from isolated solutions and toward integrated production strategies. The decisive factor is not which process dominates, but how technologies can be combined to meet specific requirements. The video “Conversations at K” uses concrete quotes from exhibitors to show how differently production strategies are conceived today—from optimized injection molding processes to strategic supplementation through additive manufacturing. The K-Mag gives you an insight into current projects that visualise the potential of modern plastics. Experience how science and industry are working together on solutions. Discover 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing The portrait was generated by AI. Author: Simone Ernst | K-Mag Simone Ernst has been writing for various industry magazines for eighteen years and has been part of the K-Mag editorial team since 2024. She is particularly interested in topics such as plastics recycling, sustainability in the plastics industry and career paths in the plastics and rubber industry. This article was created with the assistance of AI tools. At a glance Production decisions in the plastics industry are evolving from technical issues to strategic portfolio decisions. Injection molding and 3D printing are increasingly complementing each other to balance flexibility, efficiency, and future-proofing. Key Takeaway Production decisions in the plastics industry today are strategic portfolio decisions: The decisive factor is not the choice of a single technology, but the targeted combination of injection molding and 3D printing in line with specific requirements. More around Machinery & Production

    Learn more
  • Sustainability by digitalization: Inventory machines become capable of communication

    Interview with Peter Radosai, Head of Sales Europe, LWB Steinl GmbH & Co. KG Exclusively for K-MAG Copyright: Joyseulay 13.09.2022 What's old is far from bad. This also applies to machines – however, they are often not capable of communicating. Yet it is precisely this ability that is of interest when it comes to evaluating data or correcting errors. Does this mean that old machines have to fear for their jobs? The machines from injection molding machine manufacturer LWB Steinl certainly don't have to, because the company has found a way to connect even older machines to a communication network. Peter Radosai explains how this works and why it is advantageous for the company in this K-MAG interview. What functions are available to your customers through the DataBox upgrade? Peter Radosai: Via the DataBox, the operating or system data of older LWB control generations can be tapped and passed on to a higher-level production data acquisition system (PDA) or manufacturing execution system (MES). This means that older inventory machines are no longer excluded from central monitoring including data evaluation and/or data visualization of modern production monitoring systems. In its basic version, the DataBox is a "one-way system", which means that control data can only be read and forwarded to a higher-level system. How is the system integrated into the existing machines? Radosai: The communication connection to the installed control generation is made possible via two ways: either an RS 232 interface or via a connection using an RJ45 TCP/IP interface (Ethernet cable). What are the benefits for companies of making their old machines communication-enabled? Radosai: All relevant process data can be viewed centrally from outside via the DataBox: all axis movements : the paths during plasticizing and injection, the unit lift-off, the paths of the sliding table, the ejector, the core puller and the safety gate as well as the separator top and bottom pressures (back pressure and injection pressure) and speeds (injection speed, screw speed) specific process data such as job number, date and time, cycle time, heating time, shot counts, piece counts per shift, temperatures all system information such as operating mode (manual or automatic), system pressure, hydraulic operating time, alarms What are the technical requirements to use the package? Radosai: The central component is the "DataBox", a data gateway that is added to the machine control cabinet. In addition, only a 24V power supply is required. It can also be easily retrofitted if required. How do you intend to further develop the system in the future? Radosai: We are currently preparing the "Two-way System", which will also allow data to be written, tailored to individual customer requirements. Kyra Molinari (Editorial team K-MAG) More around Machinery & Plants

    Learn more
  • "The process window is very narrow and must be exactly controlled."

    Interview with Anna Rottstegge, Head of Research & Development, Reifenhäuser Reiloy Anna Rottstegge, Head of Research & Development, Reifenhäuser Reiloy. Source: Reifenhäuser 08.12.2021 What are the parameters that actually matter when it comes to wear protection? An interview with Anna Rottstegge, Head of Research & Development at Reifenhäuser Reiloy . Dr. Rottstegge, how did Reiloy come up with the idea of dealing with the specific topic of hardness in barrel wear protection? Dr. Anna Rottstegge: The main starting point of our research was some interesting contradictory feedback from our customers. First, they find that alloy hardness is specified as identical or very similar in the data sheets of all manufacturers. They therefore assume that this is the decisive factor when it comes to wear protection performance. On the downside, we find repeatedly in the field that the service life of our barrels is verifiably longer. This could not actually be the case if it depended only on the hardness of the alloy, which, as I said, is virtually the same for all suppliers. As a materials scientist, I have learned that wear protection does not only depend on hardness. That was my incentive to get to the bottom of the causes. So, we took a closer look at the microstructures in the Research and Development department and carried out our own wear tests. Where did you start analyzing the root causes? Rottstegge: First of all, we analyzed nickel-based alloys. This is where all suppliers use high-hardness tungsten monocarbides. So, we started at this point and analyzed every lead thoroughly. We carried out intensive comparative analyses on a wide variety of components, took a very close look at alloy compositions, tested the microhardness of individual phases, evaluated surface coatings using optical analysis, and then carried out an optical analysis of size distribution. That sounds like a lot of effort. Did the results justify the effort? Rottstegge: Absolutely. Because we were able to prove conclusively that there are deviations in matrix composition and the volumetric content of carbides. We assumed that longer service life would go hand in hand with higher carbide density. But it soon turned out that the carbide density of only a few market competitors was lower than ours. In fact, the major difference of our nickel-based alloys compared to other manufacturers is carbide size distribution. Or to put it another way: The greater performance of our wear protection comes not only from the higher density of its carbides. In actual fact, it is their size that provides the additional advantage. We were even able to demonstrate that they are ten times greater than the carbides of all other nickel-based alloys on the market. But of course, there are also cases among competitors where lower carbide density, an unfavorable distribution, or a higher porosity have a negative impact on service life. Did that surprise you? Rottstegge: Yes and no. It was already a conscious decision at Reifenhäuser Reiloy to select larger carbides in order to counteract specifically coarse abrasive wear in the barrel. The carbides themselves are not attacked by abrasive substances, but are simply in the way - the large ones more so than the small ones. Picture it like stones in a field that is being plowed: The plow simply pushes the smaller stones aside, but the larger stones present an obvious obstacle. In a similar way, larger carbides obstruct abrasive forces and offer significantly more resistance than smaller ones. In order to prove this scientifically, we procured or recreated alloys with smaller carbides and carried out wear tests on them, both in the lab and in actual use. Even we were totally surprised by the degree of positive evaluation compared with our own alloys. This confirms what we already learn in our materials science studies: That wear protection depends not only on macrohardness, but on the entire microstructure. Why don't other suppliers also use larger carbides in their nickel-base alloys? Rottstegge: Perhaps because the entire manufacturing process required to achieve the desired surface quality and the required diameter tolerances is particularly difficult and costly when large carbides are used. We decided to use large carbides because of their utility value and we then optimized the manufacturing process accordingly. Here, we have the major advantage that we were able to match the surface treatment of the wear protection layer (honing) to the exact requirements needed since we develop and manufacture the tools ourselves. This is also a core process at Reifenhäuser Reiloy! So far, we have talked about nickel-based alloys. What about hardness as a comparative parameter of iron-based alloys? Rottstegge: It's a similar story here. First, we also asked ourselves why our iron-based alloys achieve verifiably longer barrel service life at the same hardness. And then, in precise microstructure analyses, EDX analyses of the chemical composition, and, above all, in microhardness measurements, we worked out that it is due to the almost ceramic layer that other alloys do not possess. Could you explain this in a little more detail? Rottstegge: We are talking here about ceramic phases in combination with boron and carbon – mainly chromium-based – which are produced by the melt during the casting process. The objective of our concept is to generate a protective shield out of ceramic phases. These phases are still bonded in a metal matrix but occupy a large volume. In other words, the layer has a high hardness but is still sufficiently elastic. The entire process is geared to this. To produce the ceramic phases exactly the way we require, the composition, process temperatures, and process times must be precisely maintained. The process window is very narrow and must be exactly controlled. But we always get it right since we use the special Reiloy centrifugal casting process that we have continuously adapted and optimized over the years and we execute the entire process on specially developed machines Michael Ziegler, Communications, Reifenhäuser Group Source Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik More around Machinery & Plants

    Learn more
  • FAQ on Plagiarism Protection in the Plastics Industry

    How companies can safeguard their innovations and brands from product piracy Exclusively for K-Mag Companies in the plastics industry can protect their innovations and brands from counterfeiting with legal, technological and organisational measures. Copyright: New Africa – stock.adobe.com 19.03.2025 Only the best get copied. However, for companies in the plastics industry, it is hardly a reason to celebrate when their own products are imitated. Product piracy causes significant economic damage and endangers innovation. Especially in the plastics sector, where technological progress and material quality are essential, counterfeits can have serious consequences. The challenges posed by plagiarism for the industry are substantial. A recent example is the machinery manufacturer Starlinger, which recently successfully took action against product piracy in China and was able to enforce a production halt. However, not every company has the same resources or specialised knowledge to optimally defend itself against plagiarism. But there are proven strategies to protect oneself. This FAQ provides an overview of the most important measures and legal options. 1. What is product piracy? Product piracy refers to the illegal imitation or counterfeiting of products, often infringing patents, trademarks, or design rights. In the plastics industry, this affects, for example, counterfeit plastic parts, packaging, or machine components that are of inferior quality and can pose safety risks. Plagiarism harms companies economically, endangers innovation, and can even lead to legal consequences for manufacturers and distributors. 2. Why is plagiarism protection important for companies in the plastics sector? Plagiarism protection is essential for companies in the plastics sector for several reasons: Economic protection : Product piracy causes revenue losses and can impair competitiveness. Counterfeits undermine investments in research and development. Quality and safety risks : Counterfeit plastic products often have inferior material properties, which can lead to safety risks – e.g., in medical products, packaging, or automotive parts. Brand and company reputation protection : Inferior copies can damage a company’s image if customers mistakenly assume that the poor quality originates from the original manufacturer. Legal protection : Companies that safeguard their products through patents, trademarks, and design rights have a stronger legal foundation to take action against plagiarism. Competitive advantage : Effective plagiarism protection helps to secure unique selling points and stand out from competitors. 3. What types of plagiarism exist in the plastics industry? In the plastics industry, there are various types of plagiarism: Direct counterfeits : 1:1 copies of an original product, often with a counterfeit logo or brand name. Example : Fake plastic packaging with counterfeit brand logos. Design and functional imitations : Products that closely resemble the original but are sold under a different name. Example : A plastic component with an identical shape but without brand labelling. Technology theft & patent infringements : Illegal imitation of patented or protected plastic technologies. Example : Reproduced injection moulding tools that copy protected processes. Material counterfeiting : Use of inferior or non-specification-compliant plastics. Example : Allegedly high-quality recycled material that is actually stretched with low-grade fillers. Brand piracy : Unauthorised use of an established brand name or logo. Example : A plastic product with a well-known brand name that does not originate from the original manufacturer. Each of these forms of plagiarism can result in economic and legal risks for companies, as well as quality losses for consumers. 4. What legal regulations and protective measures exist? Companies in the plastics industry can protect themselves against plagiarism through various legal regulations and protective mechanisms: Intellectual property rights (IP protection) Patents : Protect technical inventions, e.g., new plastic processing methods or innovative material compositions. Trademark law : Secures names, logos, and designs to prevent brand piracy. Design protection (registered design) : Protects the external shape and design of a product. International protection mechanisms European Patent (EPO) & PCT Patent (WIPO) : Enable protection in multiple countries. Madrid Trademark Agreement (WIPO) : Facilitates international trademark protection. Hague Design Agreement : Serves design protection in various countries. Measures against product piracy Customs seizure by customs authorities : Companies can register their product copies with customs to stop counterfeit goods. Warnings & lawsuits : Companies can take legal action against counterfeiters and claim injunctions. Technical protection measures : Security features such as digital watermarks, RFID chips, or special material additives make imitation more difficult. Industry initiatives & networks Anti-Counterfeiting Action Groups (APM) : Advocates for the protection of intellectual property. EUIPO & Europol cooperations : Combat product counterfeiting in the European market. Companies should use a combination of legal, technological, and preventive measures to protect themselves as effectively as possible. 5. How can companies effectively protect their products and production processes from plagiarism? Companies can secure their products and production processes with a combination of technological, legal, and organisational measures : Technological protection measures Tamper-proof materials : Incorporate special additives or marker substances into plastics that are only present in the original product. RFID chips & digital watermarks : Invisible or machine-readable security features enable authenticity verification. Blockchain technology : Digital tracking of the supply chain to identify product counterfeits more easily. 3D-printed security features : Complex structures or invisible codes in plastic components that are difficult to copy. Legal protection Patents, trademarks, and design protection : Register legal protections for new products and technologies early. Contracts & non-disclosure agreements : Secure sensitive manufacturing details through NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements). Customs registrations & seizure applications : Register original products with customs authorities to stop counterfeits at borders. Secure supply chains & production Close contact with suppliers : Choose transparent and certified partners throughout the value chain. Production at multiple locations : Distribute critical manufacturing processes to make full imitations more difficult. Regular audits & controls : Conduct quality and security checks to detect leaks or counterfeits early. Customer education & authentication Certificates of authenticity or QR codes : Customers can verify products online and identify counterfeit goods more easily. Awareness campaigns : Inform retailers and end customers about the risks and identifying features of counterfeits. A holistic approach combining technical innovations with legal and organisational measures provides the best protection against product piracy in the plastics industry. 6. What economic damage is caused by product piracy in the plastics industry? Product piracy causes considerable economic damage in the plastics industry: Loss of sales & competitive disadvantages: Counterfeit products drive originals out of the market and lead to a loss of sales. In addition, original manufacturers have higher production and development costs, while counterfeiters sell more cheaply without these investments. Image and brand damage: Inferior counterfeits can lead to quality problems that are wrongly attributed to the original manufacturer. Trust in the brand dwindles if customers have negative experiences with counterfeits. Innovation brake: Companies invest less in research and development if new technologies are easily copied. A lack of investment protection ultimately weakens the innovative strength of the industry. High costs for legal disputes & protective measures: Companies have to invest in patents, brand protection and legal disputes. Additional security measures (e.g. RFID chips, digital watermarks) increase production costs. Threats to supply chains & jobs: Product piracy can lead to market distortions and cause economic difficulties for reputable companies. Job losses in affected companies are possible if market shares are lost to counterfeiters. The economic damage caused by counterfeiting is therefore far-reaching and affects not only individual companies, but the entire plastics industry. 7. What can companies do if they become victims of counterfeiting? If companies realise that their plastic products have been counterfeited, they should take systematic action: Secure evidence Document the plagiarism (photos, product samples, packaging, dealer information). Gather evidence of your own intellectual property (patents, trademarks, designs). Take legal action Contact a lawyer or patent attorney: Check whether a trade mark, patent or design infringement has occurred. Warning letter or cease and desist letter: Request the counterfeiter to stop production and distribution. Legal action: If necessary, file a lawsuit for damages and a ban on distribution. Involve authorities and institutions Inform customs authorities: Counterfeit products can be stopped by border seizure applications. Contact trademark protection organisations (e.g. EUIPO, WIPO): Support with international cases. Notify trade fairs and online platforms: Have counterfeits removed from marketplaces. Strengthen technological protection measures Introduce security features such as RFID chips, digital watermarks or special material additives. Use blockchain-based traceability to ensure authenticity. Communication & image protection Inform customers about counterfeits to maintain trust Strengthen own branding and consciously emphasise originality and quality. A combination of legal, regulatory and technological measures is usually the most effective way to defend against counterfeiting. 8. How can companies take international action against counterfeiting? Companies can take international action against counterfeiting by using a combination of legal, technological and strategic measures: Protecting intellectual property internationally International patents & trade mark applications: Secure protection through the European Patent Office (EPO), the Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT) or the Madrid trade mark system (WIPO). Design protection in several countries: Possible through the Hague Agreement for international designs. Cooperation with authorities & customs Customs declarations & seizure applications: Intercept counterfeit products at borders, e.g. through the EU customs system or CBP in the US. Co-operation with local investigative authorities: Support from national anti-counterfeiting organisations and trade associations. Marketplace control: Checking online platforms such as Alibaba, Amazon or eBay for counterfeit products and reporting offences. Contract management & supply chain protection Strict contracts with manufacturers & suppliers: Clear agreements on confidentiality and exclusive production. Use of track & trace technologies: transparency throughout the supply chain through digital tracking (e.g. blockchain) Utilise technological protection measures globally RFID tags & counterfeit-proof materials: labelling products with identification features that distinguish originals from copies. Digital watermarks & QR code verification: customers and retailers can check authenticity. Integrate networks & anti-plagiarism organisations Membership of international associations: g. Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG), INTA (International Trademark Association). Co-operation with industry initiatives: Exchange of experience with other companies in order to take joint action against counterfeiting. Proactive, international protection through legal safeguards, technological solutions and close market monitoring helps companies to combat counterfeiting more effectively worldwide. Exhibitors & products around machinery & equipment Machinery and plant for processing Post processing machines & downstream equipment Machinery & plant for finishing, decorating, printing and marking Welding machines Process automation To all exhibitors in this category Elena Blume (Editorial team K-Mag) More around Machinery & Production

    Learn more

Topics covered in K-Mag

Sustainability

Sustainability

Digitalisation

Digitalisation

Machinery & Production

Machinery & Production

Raw materials

Raw materials

Science

Science

People

People

Plastics in Practice

Plastics in Practice

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive personalised information, trade fair tips and exciting offers to help you with your planning.